Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8071 14
Original file (NR8071 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
' ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HCG
Docket No. NR8071-14
11 Mar 15

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

 

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) HQOMC memo 5400 RCT undtd
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to remove a failure of selection to the rank of Major.

2. The Board, consisting of
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies,

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

‘CONCLUSION

_ Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
‘especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
: Docket No. NR8071-14
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’ s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. Petitioner will be considered by the earliest possible
selection board convened to consider officers of his category for
promotion to Major as an officer who has not failed of selection for

promotion to that grade,

b. Any documentation relating to a failure of selection for the
FY15 Active Reserve Major Selection Board will be removed from the
Petitioner’s record.

es A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above enti}

  

Bx Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
{32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
' compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
{a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

11 Mar 15

 

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02509-09

    Original file (02509-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 and 2010 Major Selection Boards, so as to be considered by the selection board next convened to consider...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10864-09

    Original file (10864-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No: 10864-0909 19 November 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08128-08

    Original file (08128-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Major Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of major as an officer who has not failed of selection to that grade. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03363-09

    Original file (03363-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 3363-09 10 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: a See REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION) Ref: . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06558-06

    Original file (06558-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Major Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of major as an officer who has not failed to that grade. The Board, consisting of Ms....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03443 12

    Original file (03443 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S,. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by completely removing the fitness report for 18 June 2007 to 31 May 2008 (copy at Tab A), modified in his previous case by the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) by removal of section K...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08270-09

    Original file (08270-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 8270-09 14 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] : “eee ar eet REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. 1552: Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 18 Mar 09 w/attachments (2) HQMC MMER/PERB memo dtd 26 Jun 09 (3) HOMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 21 Jul 09 (4) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference-(a),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01582-11

    Original file (01582-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No: 1582-11 10 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tes Secretary of the Navy ij REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02737-01

    Original file (02737-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2002 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams and Harrison and Ms. Moidel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05822-01

    Original file (05822-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Enclosure (4) is the advisory opinion from the HQMC Career Management Team (CMT) recommending denial of Petitioner ’s request to remove his failure of selection before the FY 2002 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. [Petitioner ’s] overall record is less than competitive when compared with his peers. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has Date of Report Reporting...